what is thinking?People can agree about much that is thinkinwhat is thinking?People can agree about much that is thinking,and much that is not thinking; but they can’t reach agreement because the word “think” is not a scientific word with an

来源:学生作业帮助网 编辑:作业帮 时间:2024/11/16 11:31:46
what is thinking?People can agree about much that is thinkinwhat is thinking?People can agree about much that is thinking,and much that is not thinking; but they can’t reach agreement because the word “think” is not a scientific word with an
xS]S"G+(v+ϔ}[N-3v]H@,hD7Yb{ڧ 9= Ȧ|!UI^`sHfe}Ua{0ft&f-uE9bH&%ɐfƿ1YߐxN&Y]Cz61-g2q4x+f H1n1#1?>bk&ߐӉ,nXeiS¬kIQ4gi-T&zV[s̿ #E.t Dײ |KP LM{l aJZ%l~7.`bg`-JCA*Ip(45$Ve4tzK eUf%_Tsi:Qw<Mآ2=qzOw٤{M:pRJ1E~oQ);:Q+5:h߰qD[ܹJ178!kK9Dh),OiKL&8Zփr:+y}I;c^9^=+-ĕz|KSiφ=:l*ɾW `\błp+j%lcj-UH`% WTgQ;`@frB|Z?WwRp.BB3ɥA %FYO=> kV*H*}94Y>ޘ̕Sʡ 0'z#,>7@C5 >+ E즊*`Kn »E:KEҔr l/٤n3r-zC%Vb7()L$<yOkS+,^FG{KSmDpffQtTP9 T/e)Ҳlod券F;BR5}l=[3w7bsNʝ_ ;,

what is thinking?People can agree about much that is thinkinwhat is thinking?People can agree about much that is thinking,and much that is not thinking; but they can’t reach agreement because the word “think” is not a scientific word with an
what is thinking?People can agree about much that is thinkin
what is thinking?People can agree about much that is thinking,and much that is not thinking; but they can’t reach agreement because the word “think” is not a scientific word with an exact meaning.A lot of the discussion is wasted breath because the persons are using different meanings of the word “think”.
It would be too early to say that after the next 200 years,machines will not be thinking.And to consider that machines can think gives people a big push to give to machines more and more work in thinking.

what is thinking?People can agree about much that is thinkinwhat is thinking?People can agree about much that is thinking,and much that is not thinking; but they can’t reach agreement because the word “think” is not a scientific word with an
什么是thinking 人们对于thinking都持有不同的意见,难以取得统一.关于thinking的意思一直不能一致是因为think这个词语并不是一个系统性的词语,它没有特定的意思.因为think这个词在不同语境下表达出不同的意思,所以做再多关于think的讨论依旧是无用功的.
即使再过200年也不能给think下一个准确的定义,即使是机器也不会思考,它们不会考虑到给人类一个大的推动来研究以后让机器做更多关于思考方面的工作.
自己翻译的.不确定百分百正确.应该差不多也就这样.

什么是思维的人都同意的事多是思想,许多是没有思想?但他们不能达成协议,因为这个字“想”是不是一个有科学词汇的确切含义。一个讨论的气息,因为很多被浪费的人使用这个词的不同含义“思考”。
这将是过早地说,在未来200年后,机器就不会考虑。并考虑了机器能想到给人一个很大的推动把机器思维越来越多的工作...

全部展开

什么是思维的人都同意的事多是思想,许多是没有思想?但他们不能达成协议,因为这个字“想”是不是一个有科学词汇的确切含义。一个讨论的气息,因为很多被浪费的人使用这个词的不同含义“思考”。
这将是过早地说,在未来200年后,机器就不会考虑。并考虑了机器能想到给人一个很大的推动把机器思维越来越多的工作

收起