SAT语法题一道peter the great totally changed the landscape of St.Petersburg (and it had been) a swamp unused by previous tsars.答案说括号内的有错,错在哪儿?明明后面那句所说的内容就是在change之前为什么不用过去

来源:学生作业帮助网 编辑:作业帮 时间:2024/11/15 09:18:25
SAT语法题一道peter the great totally changed the landscape of St.Petersburg (and it had been) a swamp unused by previous tsars.答案说括号内的有错,错在哪儿?明明后面那句所说的内容就是在change之前为什么不用过去
xT_OP*Q_hWvBP@(8Q@AuPǠ0ܶO~2Dęe&m{g}0mYE-ZA>̇HǓυIx5̭EX.$,rA~$ a<2+D<&ָOA D`_$,p!mD2[/nj-ZNZ _(_غEVԊAJ"9:AkZT!wRmUD#팑4 kohfBPi*h5 zx+w%+ct!BE1 HWeM'tad*ۆE|OC~Ug2F+,'Hq5P*]TZ?LՔzϡ0كkUE1̣Bn,޸5A&z[C&̑tTNHÌit#7/RSp+9eyM -٣*F2Ao{&]zxi 8Ϡׅ~A.0;44Կua3||^Ih -E|E\_ƶ|,X݇nr B-G+QMNbӉ4bFgy5mg=SΎ$LzE? s4X]c\df ?3"dq͍Ae)PR xNklᴿ$b oTbap鲰dqMBoN5&"&d 9e#MM!7p7B\]n 9bF8zlfe

SAT语法题一道peter the great totally changed the landscape of St.Petersburg (and it had been) a swamp unused by previous tsars.答案说括号内的有错,错在哪儿?明明后面那句所说的内容就是在change之前为什么不用过去
SAT语法题一道
peter the great totally changed the landscape of St.Petersburg (and it had been) a swamp unused by previous tsars.答案说括号内的有错,错在哪儿?明明后面那句所说的内容就是在change之前为什么不用过去完成时?

SAT语法题一道peter the great totally changed the landscape of St.Petersburg (and it had been) a swamp unused by previous tsars.答案说括号内的有错,错在哪儿?明明后面那句所说的内容就是在change之前为什么不用过去
这里不是过去完成时的问题系,而是属于 it 指代不明的错误.
  Peter the great totally changed the landscape of St.Petersburg 和 (and it had been) a swamp unusedby previous tsars 是并列句.第一分句中的宾语是 landscape of St.Petersburg,其中landscape 指事物,St.Petersburg 指地点,都可以用代词 it 指代.所以,第二分句的主语 it 属于指代不明.it had been a swamp 既可以理解为 the landscape had been a swamp(这里的地貌曾经是一片沼泽),也可以理解为 St.Petersburg had been a swamp (圣彼得堡曾经是一片沼泽).

Peter (the great totally changed the landscape of St. Petersburg ) has been a swamp unused by previous tsars.

改成 St. Petersbur, which had been a swamp unused by previous tsars.
要用定语从句,否则就是句子杂揉

前后主语不一致。
前句主语是Peter the Great,后句主语是it(the landscape of St. Petersburg),即前句的宾语。
这种情况不能简单用连词and连接,而应该采取直接断为两句或者采用定语从句的办法。

两句话没有逻辑关系啊 后面的句子就是单纯的是过去发生的事情对现在依然有影响 用现在完成时